Hi everyone, please use the link below to join today’s meeting (10th April). We’re currently experiencing some issues and will resolve them as soon as possible. Thank you for your patience!
Hi everyone
Again thank you so much for joining today’s meet
The time limit for zoom meet was 40 mins (since it’s a free account), next meeting onwards we would use a different zoom link. Again thank you so much! and really sorry for the abrupt end
Summarizing and researching the papers attached in the Google Doc: Problem Research - Google Docs (this will also contribute to the content of our paper)
The goal is to make the prototype as user-friendly as possible for normal crew members, while also keeping the medical details clear and useful for the Chief Medical Officer.
Expected help:
Improve layout, wording, colors, and user flow
Make crew-facing instructions simple and clear
Separate normal crew view from medical/CMO-level details
Experience with UI/UX, Figma, React/frontend design, clinical interfaces, or human factors is helpful.
If you are interested, please add your information so we can arrange a meeting and define the next steps.
I will be its not the complete omics of Protein, whole genome sequencce etc or destined to be part of a Monte Carlo so you will be oversimplifying all that you are recording.
And do you have a section for comments on Topor experiments?
Hi AliReza,
Since I’m already part of the AI group, I’ve been analyzing our research repository—specifically the focus on Earth-Independent Medical Operations and the physiological challenges like SANS and Cardiovascular monitoring.
I’m ready to take an active role in the UI/UX team to ensure the CDSS prototype isn’t just functional, but clinically sound for high-stress, autonomous environments. With my background as an RN and my focus on XAI (Explainable AI), I can help refine the interface so that the clinical evidence and “Act Now” instructions are perfectly balanced for the crew’s cognitive load.
I’ve already reviewed the current layout in Graph Studio. Please share the Figma link so I can begin auditing the user flow and aligning it with the medical protocols we are documenting.
Let’s get to work.
Best regards,
Vanessa Montiel Ruiz
I’m following up on the latest updates for the CDSS development. I am ready to jump in and contribute to both the i4 mission dataset analysis and the UI/UX prototyping.
Given my background as a Licensed RN and my experience in AI/ML, I can help in two specific ways:
Data Analysis (i4 Mission): I can assist in auditing the i4 datasets to ensure the clinical variables are correctly prioritized for the CDSS logic.
UI/UX Implementation: I’ve been reviewing the CDSS Graph Studio prototype. I want to ensure that the findings from the research papers (SANS, cardiovascular changes, etc.) are translated into an intuitive and fail-safe interface for the crew.
I’ve already looked at the Google Sheets and the problem research document. I’ll add my name to the tasks right now.
Please share the Figma link so I can align the interface with the data insights we are gathering.
Best regards,
Vanessa Montiel Ruiz
I recently joined the OSDR, and I am actively looking for projects that I could help contribute to. I would love to help improve the CDSS prototype for space-health scenarios! I have some experience in UI/UX and React programming. Let’s arrange a meeting to layout some project specifics.
Hi @robertn01 ,
i want to response your comment ( Join the CDSS Subgroup! - #39 by robertn01 )here, as i wish to remove other CDSS forums to prevent confusion (even myself , i spent minutes to find the main forum between 4 cdss related forums :D)
Thanks for sharing this paper ,I see their nobility in these : introducing an earth independent software (Possibly they are going for commercialization as they don’t provide github or anything!) , targeting Ultrasonography and kidney status as use case , evaluation on real astronaut feedback in real world environment (ISS).When i think about our own strategy to solve EIMO (earth independent medical operation) , i see almost same pattern with significant difference
1- i think software structure problem is more a generalizability and fit for real world (space-ship , astrounate ) problem , and less about specific diseases !
2-for AWGs i prefer open - community engaging software so other open-science community members , other GeneLab experts can build on top of that as they are mostly working in NASA itself and know alot about problem!
3- evaluation need to be done on an analouge of real world situation , having astronauts in our team is possible(i 'm talking with some !) , but putting software on ISS or same spaces is less possible !
As mentioned before , Inspiration 4 dataset is a great resource which we can use for CDSS validation.
OSD-575 is “SpaceX Inspiration4 Blood Serum Metabolic Panel and Immune/Cardiac Cytokine Arrays”
as @Abiponnusamy asked , i provide a working google Colab so CDSS Engineering team can use as a tutorial to reach ODSR API .
feel free to use or modify it ,
Best