Bone vs Brain OSDR-SPOKE Subgroup

Happy Friday everyone :grinning:

Starting next month, we will focus on integrating datasets for a single anatomy within the SPOKE fabric. The current options are brain :brain: and bone :bone:, both offering diverse data types and significant spaceflight relevance. Please vote for your preferred anatomy and suggest relevant data types, specific datasets, and/or compelling spaceflight use cases. If you strongly favor another anatomy, please provide your suggestion.

Project objectives:

  • Collect anatomy-specific datasets.
  • Identify node type(s) for SPOKE entry point(s).
  • Determine if additional databases are needed to integrate the dataset.
  • Create mappings between dataset identifiers and nodes.
  • Define the graph representation for the dataset.
  • Develop a pipeline for incorporating future datasets of the same type.
  • Run SPOKE analyses.

Best,

Charlotte

@HUMANawg

9 Likes

Can i ask why Bone? My understanding is there are no 'omics datasets on bone in OSDR. There are some mCT, pQCT, histology, others, but no 'omics, and since right now SPOKE is only mapped to RNAseq, curious of the driving reason, unless the purpose is to have this work do the mapping for the fabric between non-omics bone datasets?

2 Likes

Hi Ryan, We’ve received significant interest in applying SPOKE analyses to bone health in spaceflight. While SPOKE has been successfully utilized with omics data, we want to incorporate non-omics datasets as well.

Non-Transcriptomics
OSD-310 (Histological Assay), OSD-345 (protein expression profiling), OSD-351 (Bone Microstructure), OSD-471 (Bone Microstructure), OSD-486 (Bone Microstructure), OSD-489 (Bone Microstructure), OSD-608 (Bone Microstructure), OSD-653 (Bone Microstructure), OSD-654 (Bone Microstructure), OSD-661 (Bone Microstructure), OSD-663 (Bone Microstructure/Protein Quant.), OSD-804 (Bone Microstructure), OSD-539 (transcripomics Human Cartilage)
Mouse Transcriptomics in OSDR
OSD-214 (Bone Marrow), OSD-457 (Temporal Bone, Mandibular bone), OSD-467 (Cortical Bone), OSD-402 (Single cell transcripomics bone marrow of femur), OSD-403 (Single cell transcripomics bone marrow of humerus)

3 Likes

That said Brain was the unanimous pick during today’s meeting!

3 Likes

Brain! But of course I would say that :slight_smile:

3 Likes

Hey @canelson! Interested in this subgroup. Please let me know when is the next meeting scheduled?

1 Like

Brain.

Brain (I voted in the meeting, FYI to avoid double counting)

1 Like

Pardon my naivety, but have muscle and bone been integrated? If so, can you link? If not, that seems like a good place to start. See: Molecular bases of the crosstalk between bone and muscle - PMC

2 Likes

Brain and bone would be a fantastic pair! There is an interesting difference regarding H3.3 genes in brain and bones, and histone proteins/chromatin 3D structure may play a significant role due to microgravity and DNA repair due to radiation

1 Like

+1 for brain here (closely related anatomies from a cellular perspective (eg. retina) might also be interesting to connect to)

1 Like

The interesting choice would be brain even though creating an graph with high confidence could be challenging than Bone.

1 Like

Brain would be a good start. Would like to be a part of this!

1 Like

Great, but do you also have data on the gut microbiome and bone health?

1 Like

Great question. Should be checked thoroughly @canelson

I do remember bone marrow data, are they any gut microbiome data from those same subjects?

1 Like

Hi Brandon, This is very interesting. Given SPOKE’s structure, where Anatomy nodes connect to Anatomy, Genes, Cell Types, and Diseases, it’s possible that we could identify additional pathways between bone and muscle Anatomy nodes that reveal the underlying crosstalk mechanisms. It would be even better if we could layer in additional datasets from the same anatomy pairs.

Hi Majid, I’m not sure if we have both from the same subject, but we could still integrate this data if you find it from an outside source.

1 Like

Thank you :blush:, but I need to compare bone volume loss in space with the population changes of different gut microbiota species in space. Therefore, I need metagenomic gut data along with bone loss data from the same sample in space.

1 Like

Thanks @canelson! I’m still a bit new to the area, but I’d imagine there are at least a few animal/human studies that have evaluated muscle/bone or at least biomarkers from the same mission

1 Like

I do know Charlotte will holding a sub-group project meeting on Tuesday:

https://awg.osdr.space/t/human-awg-spoke-subgroup/1289

1 Like