Hi @robertn01 ,
i want to response your comment ( Join the CDSS Subgroup! - #39 by robertn01 )here, as i wish to remove other CDSS forums to prevent confusion (even myself , i spent minutes to find the main forum between 4 cdss related forums :D)
Thanks for sharing this paper ,I see their nobility in these : introducing an earth independent software (Possibly they are going for commercialization as they don’t provide github or anything!) , targeting Ultrasonography and kidney status as use case , evaluation on real astronaut feedback in real world environment (ISS).When i think about our own strategy to solve EIMO (earth independent medical operation) , i see almost same pattern with significant difference
1- i think software structure problem is more a generalizability and fit for real world (space-ship , astrounate ) problem , and less about specific diseases !
2-for AWGs i prefer open - community engaging software so other open-science community members , other GeneLab experts can build on top of that as they are mostly working in NASA itself and know alot about problem!
3- evaluation need to be done on an analouge of real world situation , having astronauts in our team is possible(i 'm talking with some !) , but putting software on ISS or same spaces is less possible !
also i’m keen to have your thoughts !
Thanks