New Plant Growth Chamber Subgroup

Dear AWG Members,

I’m introducing a new project idea for the PlantAWG: Plant Growth Chamber Subgroup. If you’re interested, please fill out this form so we can figure out what time is best to meet! (https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdL69rbFcyrw55g87nhoXxQ4WAhnJ7GHB5CdVpvNnCIx-CRrg/viewform?usp=publish-editor)! :seedling:

Summary

Sealed growth chambers can create low-oxygen conditions, altering hypoxia/ROS signaling, which is known to confound microgravity effects. The EMCS hardware (OSD-314) provides a tightly controlled atmosphere (air-tight, regulated N₂/O₂/CO₂, ethylene removal), whereas the CARA plates (OSD-120) were exposed to the ambient ISS atmosphere. Prior analyses found clear hypoxic stress signatures. Starting with OSD-314 and OSD-120, this subgroup aims to compare sealed vs. ambient ISS growth conditions to help separate potential hypoxia responses from broader spaceflight environmental effects. For an overall approach, we’ll be conducting comparative transcriptomic analyses across selected datasets, pathway analyses, and creating a harmonized metadata table.

Research Question

Do sealed (EMCS) vs. ambient-cabin growth conditions produce distinct hypoxia/ROS transcriptional signatures in space-grown Arabidopsis? The hypothesis is that EMCS-grown plants will show stronger enrichment of hypoxia/ROS pathways, whereas a subset of gravitropism/cytoskeleton-related pathways will be consistent across chamber types.

Deliverables

The expected deliverables include a harmonized metadata table and a summarized gene- and pathway-level map distinguishing between the datasets and hardwares (for comparison), with the goal of presenting the results at a conference such as ASGSR or AGU and/or a submission to GSR.

@borjabarbero @rachelcrivero @dr.richard.barker @rtscott2001

@PlantAWG @HardwareAWG

7 Likes

This subgroup sounds awesome and valuable! Just filled out the form and I’m eager to get to collaborate :saluting_face:

5 Likes

Has anyone done any research on those small Biospheres that people create in jars? There was this one guy that successfully made a small biosphere in a jar that has been sealed away for going on 30 years. Maybe for a sealed plant growth chamber it might need to mirror comparable to a mini-biosphere jar? Spit-balling here…
This is so exciting though!!

6 Likes

@Morgan_Waltz great idea! It would be awesome if any “terrarium” style experiments or any studies with justify billy spaceflight related methods that include analyse volatiles would be of great interest and really cool :smiling_face_with_sunglasses:

1 Like

I’ll try to harden these OSD’s next week, see if I can find something out here.
Cool stuff!

2 Likes

This reminds me of those lightning in a jar videos, but I can see your angle here. Sounds interesting to add this into the mix.

2 Likes

This is definitely a really cool idea! We could take a look into that.

2 Likes

Hello everyone,

First meeting for the Plant Growth Chamber Subgroup will occur Saturday March 14th at 4pm PST. We’ll be meeting bi-weekly for now!

Here’s the invite to the meeting:

Saturday, March 14 · 4:00 – 5:00pm

Time zone: America/Los_Angeles

Video call link: https://meet.google.com/brh-tbca-gnr

See you all soon!

@PlantAWG

In the meantime, here are some datasets that you can familiarize yourself with for the project: OSD-120, OSD-314, and OSD-213.

2 Likes

Hi & Happy Friday,
I just finished hardening OSD-120 (CARA roots) into a 5-notebook series on Kaggle and thought this group might care about the plant side specifically.

By Day 13 these roots have already gone through the shock of weightlessness and settled into a new program, so the DEGs are basically “how Col-0, phyD, and WS decided to live in space.” The pipeline takes 36 samples and 28k rRNA-removed genes through QC → DESeq2 → DEG overlap → enrichment and lands on a small set of shared circadian genes that stay active no matter which genotype you fly.

I’m not a biologist by training, but the graphs (PCA, DEG patterns, circadian/pathway plots) actually helped me understand the plant biology a lot better, so I figured it might be useful for others too. Next up I’ll be running the same pipeline on OSD-314 sealed-pod data to see how much of this ISS light/circadian story holds. Again the graphs & the pipeline tell the whole story.

Do let me know, if you have anything you want me to zone in while I put the next OSD into my development schedule for the next couple of weeks.
Thx!

Notebook series (Gravity’s Series NB01–NB05):
:paperclip: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/gastondana/osd-120-cara-arabidopsis-iss-rna-seq-rrnarm/code

1 Like

Do you have a model that looks at the effect of light vs dark treament on Earth and i flight?

Great question, and that’s NoteBook/NB06. Adding a dedicated light × dark interaction model (Earth vs. in-flight, 2x2 contrast) before I move on to the next dataset. I want to make sure OSD-120 is fully covered before forking.

However, the pipeline’s already hardened so it shouldn’t take long to add, I’ll drop it in the series & mention you & the others when it’s live(if you all would like of course). If there are other angles, areas, or specifics that the group wants captured before I move on, now’s the time to mention them.

Also, just a reminder the original goal of this pipeline was to capture the full consciousness of the OSD-120 dataset across all 5 notebooks, not just one angle, but somewhat of a whole story. My plan from the start was to harden these datasets and hand them off, letting the group take them wherever the science leads.

I’m a bit stretched right now so I can’t guarantee I’ll make every meeting, but the notebooks are public, the pipeline is reproducible, and you’re more than welcome to dig in, fork, and build on whatever I introduced here.

Thx